So today, Kanu finally entered his defence but something interesting happened in the court. He took his time to abuse the presiding judge, James Omotosho to the fullest but WHY?
Well, I had the privilege to be brought up to speed with the current happenings of the case by a close friend of mine who is a lawyer and is conversant with the case. I must say that the entire trial is not built on the FAIR HEARING doctrine. The foundation of the charge is faulty because NNAMDI KALU was arraigned upon a charge which was framed on a repealed law. So technical he′s being charged over an unwritten law which is against s.36(12) CFRN 1999 and also the court in the famous Aoko and Fagbemi case reinforces that nobody can be tried for an offence which at the time of its commission does not amount to an offence.
Secondly, the preceding judge James Omotosho refused a FINAL WRITTEN ADDRESS which is sacrosanct in every trial denial of it vitiates the entire trial and makes it not being FAIR TRIAL. So the entire trial of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is political and does not conform to the constitution or any procedural or substantive law. LET′S WAIT FOR THE JUDGMENT ON THE 20TH.
“JUST IN: Court fixes November 20 for judgment in Nnamdi Kanu’s ‘terrorism’ trial - TheCable”